The finals of the first inter class debate competition of the college of humanities and law went on smoothly

In order to promote the construction of learning style of our college,train students' logical thinking and language expression ability,activate the humanistic atmosphere of our college, and strengthen thestudy and communication among students, our college held the firstinterclass debate competition for young students of grammar in May,2018. After the fierce elimination competition, four team ssuccessfully qualified for the semi-finals, they are class 1 of 18law, class 4 of 18 law, class 7 of 18 law and class 1 of 18philosophy, and the team that finally won the final ticket is class 1of 18 philosophy and class 1 of 18 law.

On the afternoon of May 31, the finals of the first youth interclassdebate competition were held in the 115th lecture hall, building 7.Senior professors of Chinese language and literature major of ourcollege, counselors shi yu, wang yue, li weishun, team leader zhangtian, team member lv wanfang and other judges and guests attended thefinal. The debate in the finals was whether the university examsshould be highlighted or not. Philosophy class 1 of grade 18 is thepositive side, law class 1 of grade 18 is the negative side.

Moderator for opening remarks

Judges and guests attending the finals

At the beginning of the game, there was a tension between the needle andthe wheat. The contestants presented their arguments with clarity andincreased the credibility of their arguments. At the beginning,zhengfang opened the door to express his attitude that the universityexam should focus on. They focus from the following two aspects ofattack and defense: first, the key points are conducive to improvingthe students' review efficiency, improve their knowledge system.Secondly, the key points are conducive to students to better allocatetheir own time, have the freedom to choose the conditions for the development of life. Not to be outdone, the students on the oppositeside also insisted that the university exams should not be markedwith key points. They think that highlighting is an unfair act. Theyargue that high grades achieved through short bursts of focusedrevision are unfair to students who are already studying hard.Moreover, they believe that highlighting is unnecessary. Collegestudents should develop in an all-round way instead of mastering in ashort period of time, which will greatly diminish the role of collegeeducation.

At tackand debate and free debate, the two sides come and go, bickering,arguing, not nervous stimulation. The novel viewpoint, the original Angle, the not unusual strength all made the judge and the audience fresh and fresh, left a deep impression. After the conclusion of thetwo sides, is the audience interaction on the field. The audienceasked the contestants questions about the debate. The contestants listened and answered the questions carefully, which made theaudience full of benefits. After the interaction, the game enteredthe end. In the judging section, the judges carefully analyzed andcommented on the contestants' state and arguments, and put forward relevant Suggestions, which made people enlightened and benefited alot.

The pros and cons of the second debate

The opposing side countered with three arguments

The audience put questions to the side

The judges put forward their own opinions and comments on the topic

Thejudges made professional comments on both sides

Teacher shi yu gives advice to the contestants from both sides

Mr.Gao liguo gave his comments

After careful consideration and heated discussion, the judges decided toaward the champion to class 1 in law of level 18 of the opposingside, and the runner-up to class 1 in philosophy of level 18, whilethe winner of the "best debater" was the third debater ofthe opposing side.

The contestants took a photo with the judges

The first grammar youth interclass debate competition came to an end. Looking back at the details of the debate competition, the full passion of the debaters and their verbal sparring, all of which made us remember deeply and all of which showed the elegant demeanor ofhumanity!

It is reported that in order to meet the growing enthusiasm of students debate, uphold the principle of "friendship first", soon,the instructors will be with the champion team 18 law class 1 to havea debate exhibition match, please pay attention!

Attached debate:

Preliminary:

Intoday's China, higher education should adhere to the principle of"easy in, easy out"

Thesemi:

1.Who is more suitable to be a husband, wukong or sha seng? (classvs18, class 7, grade 18)

2.When you can't have both love and marriage, which one should youchoose? (level 18, Chinese language and literature, class 4, vslevel18, law class 4)

3.Whether distance is the stumbling block of love (level 18, class 9,vslevel 18, class 1)

Thesemi-final:

1.Which is more pathetic, never owned or about to die? (vs18 law class4, philosophy class 1, grade 18)

2.Put an end to piracy. Which should play a more important role,consumers or the government?

Thefinal:

College examination should be marked with key points (level 18, law class 1,vslevel 18, philosophy class 1)

Author:Lin Haipeng    From：collegeof humanities and law